This article purposes to consider how should the government or law respond to the emergency of pandemic caused by COVID-19. First, I argue that the frustration and anger people feel during pandemic is not caused by pandemic, but pandemic only revealed people’s underlying awareness of unfairness in general regardless of pandemic. Second, I consider the value of the rule of law by comparing deontology and consequentialism. Basically, consequentialism is supposed to prefer flexible extrajudicial measures to the strict rule of law. However, I argue that consequentialism can promote the value of the rule of law if it is combined with conservatism.
本報告書は、2022年3月に刊行された「アフターコロナの公正社会」の第1章「緊急事態における正しさ」を抜粋したものです。 コロナ禍という「緊急事態」において、公正とはどのように捉えるべきなのかにつき、 哲学的な考察を展開します。
| タイトル | 「緊急事態における正しさ」Justice in Emergency |
|---|---|
| 著者名 | 川瀬 貴之（千葉大学准教授） Takayuki Kawase(Chiba University) |
| 発行年月日／出版社 | 2022年3月31日／明石書店 |
| 言語 | 英語 |
| Download |
